課程名稱 |
婦女與社會政策 Women and Social Policy |
開課學期 |
108-2 |
授課對象 |
社會科學院 社會工作學研究所 |
授課教師 |
王麗容 |
課號 |
SW7032 |
課程識別碼 |
330 M1200 |
班次 |
|
學分 |
3.0 |
全/半年 |
半年 |
必/選修 |
選修 |
上課時間 |
星期一2,3,4(9:10~12:10) |
上課地點 |
社110 |
備註 |
大學部四年級可修習。 限碩士班以上 總人數上限:10人 外系人數限制:3人 |
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1082SW7032_ |
課程簡介影片 |
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
課程大綱
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
課程概述 |
本課程是碩士班(M字頭)課程,目的在於培養學生具有社會政策的性別思考與性別政策的規劃能力,並且將會著重跨領域和跨國研究之討論和學習。
課程內容分為四大部分:
第一部分是婦女與性別政策的相關理論。此部份將探討性別理論與福利國家,同時也將探討自由主義與性別與社會政策的關係,以及社會權,相對於性別階層化和性別權力是否相對立?另外是探討攸關婦女與福利國家的性別角色和婦女人權的變遷。
第二部分是婦女與性別政策的相關政策領域。這部分將會包括性別與勞動政策或是勞動市場與社會政策,社會權與生殖選擇政策,以及自由主義和性別化政策。
第三部分是探討國家、市場與家庭三者的關係。此部分將探討歐洲婦女之工作,家庭以及社會政策,挪威和瑞典友善女性福利國家,接著是義大利的性別、禮物關係和福利國家文化,再其次是法國的婦女,工作與福利。
第四部分將是性別政策的實例討論。家庭政策與生育率的提升,性別平等與生育率等等。 |
課程目標 |
課程設計主要目標有三:
1.培養學生成為敏於婦女與性別政策的分析和規劃者:將協助學生認識性別政策議題的形成和規劃,以及政策資源配置的性別融入。
2.培養學生成為婦女與性別政策的檢視者:認識性別社會政策檢視的相關方法,以及國際性別政策形成過程和運作結果。
3.培養學生成為婦女與社會政策變遷的行動者:包括學習性別政策介入和模擬政策實務的參與,不只是有性別政策的知識,希望有性別政策的行動與實務運作的能力。 |
課程要求 |
Assignment 1: Information literacy
Assignment 2: 婦女政策理論基礎
Assignment 3: 婦女政策相關法制
Assignment 4: Final paper
Presentation and discussion |
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
Office Hours |
每週一 12:20~12:50 |
指定閱讀 |
王麗容(1995). 婦女與社會政策。台北:巨流。
O'connor, J., Odloff, A.S & Shaver, S.(1999). States, markets, and families. Cambrige University Press.
F. Willians (1989).Social policy: A critical introduction. London: Polity Press.
F. Willian ( 1995). Race/ethinicity,gender and class in welfare state: A framework for comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gallian,P. (1997). Social policy: A new feminist analysis. |
參考書目 |
Gallian,P. (1997). Social policy: A new feminist analysis.
The rest is refered to the weekly session. |
評量方式 (僅供參考) |
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
1. |
Assingment 1 |
10% |
please refer to my email attached. |
2. |
essay1--Assignment 2 |
20% |
Every student is required to present summary of papers at least two times in a semester with a summary and comment of peer-reviewed articles. 2000-3000 words . First one might be theoretical paper. |
3. |
participation and discussion |
20% |
This is a course in master program which requring more discussion and interactive learning shown in the class. All students need to be more active and participative in the class. |
4. |
final report |
30% |
Final report is required as a center peice for performance evaluation. Studetns need to select a women issue and try to develop a policy-oriented paper. |
5. |
essay 2--assignment 3 |
20% |
Every student is required to present summary of papers at least two times in a semester with a summary and comment of peer-reviewed articles. 2000-3000 words . The second one might be related to policy analysis paper. |
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
第1週 |
3/02 |
【Week 1】Orientation |
第2週 |
3/09 |
【Week 2】Review of social policy: Concepts |
第3週 |
3/16 |
【Week 3】Women and the labour market
Craig, L., Powell, A., & Cortis, N. (2012). Self-employment, work-family time and the gender division of labour. Work, employment and society, 26(5), 716-734.
Hegewisch, A., & Gornick, J. C. (2011). The impact of work-family policies on women's employment: a review of research from OECD countries. Community, Work & Family, 14(2), 119-138.
劉梅君(2008)。職場玻璃天花板現象。《台灣勞工季刊》,勞工內心話,75-79。 |
第4週 |
3/23 |
【Week 4】Women and Labor-market: Friendly working environment and working right
Basford, T. E., Offermann, L. R., & Behrend, T. S. (2014). Do you see what I see? Perceptions of gender microaggressions in the workplace. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(3), 340-349.
Hunt, C. M., Davidson, M. J., Fielden, S. L., & Hoel, H. (2010). Reviewing sexual harassment in the workplace–an intervention model. Personnel Review, 39(5), 655-673.
楊聰財、魏兆玟(2009)。性騷擾防治法實施後之職場相關文獻分析。《亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊》,5(2),195-203。 |
第5週 |
3/30 |
【Week 5】Women and health care
Plichta, S. B. (2007). Interactions between victims of intimate partner violence against women and the health care system: policy and practice implications. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 8(2), 226-239.
Ferszt, G. G., & Clarke, J. G. (2012). Health care of pregnant women in US state prisons. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 23(2), 557-569.
張珏、陳芬苓、張菊惠、徐儆暉(2011)。職場經期健康與生理假實施初探。《台灣公共衛生雜誌》,30(5),436-450。 |
第6週 |
4/06 |
【Week 6】Women, marriage and personal social services |
第7週 |
4/13 |
【Week 7】Women and care/gender and disaster
Cantillon, B., Ghysels, J., Mussche, N., & Van Dam, R. (2001). Female employment differences, poverty and care provisions. European societies, 3(4), 447-469.
Singleton, J. (2000). Women caring for elderly family members: Shaping non-traditional work and family initiatives. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 31(3), 367-375.
歐紫彤、洪惠芬(2017)。 [最理想] 照顧安排?-文化解釋觀點。《臺灣社會福利學刊》,13(2),1-77。 |
第8週 |
4/20 |
【Week 8】Women and education (gender education)
Bailey, L. E., & Graves, K. (2016). Gender and education. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 682-722.
Subrahmanian, R. (2005). Gender equality in education: Definitions and measurements. International Journal of Educational Development, 25(4), 395-407.
潘慧玲、黃馨慧(2016)。性別平等教育議題融入課程的回顧與展望。《課程與教學》,19(2),1-26。 |
第9週 |
4/27 |
【Week 9】Women and aging and caregiving (或參訪)
Burr, V., & Colley, H. (2019). ‘I just felt as though I had to drop something’: the implications of care for female working elder carers’ working lives. Ageing & Society, 39(5), 877-898.
Davidson, P. M., DiGiacomo, M., & McGrath, S. J. (2011). The feminization of aging: how will this impact on health outcomes and services?. Health care for women international, 32(12), 1031-1045.
韋淑玲(2009)。《從女性主義觀點談老年婦女相關的健康議題》。領導護理,10(2),7-14. |
第10週 |
5/04 |
【Week 10】family policy
Lohmann, H., & Zagel, H. (2016). Family policy in comparative perspective: The concepts and measurement of familization and defamilization. Journal of European Social Policy, 26(1), 48-65.
Dykstra, P. A. (2018). Cross-national differences in intergenerational family relations: The influence of public policy arrangements. Innovation in Aging, 2(1), igx032.
林萬億(2002)台灣的家庭變遷與家庭政策。《臺大社會工作學刊》,6,35-88。 |
第11週 |
5/11 |
【Week 11】Women, Better Cohort, and Social Policy |
第12週 |
5/18 |
【Week 12】Anti- violence against women policy
Watts, C., & Zimmerman, C. (2002). Violence against women: global scope and magnitude. The lancet, 359(9313), 1232-1237.
Htun, M., & Weldon, S. L. (2012). The civic origins of progressive policy change: Combating violence against women in global perspective, 1975–2005. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 548-569.
王珮玲(2010)。親密伴侶暴力案件保護令成效與相關因素之研究:以禁制、遷出及遠離令爲例。《社會政策與社會工作學刊》, 14(2),1-47。 |
第13週 |
5/25 |
【Week 13】Immigrant Women and social policy
Ogawa, R., Oishi, A. S., Chan, R. K., & Wang, L. R. (2018). Introduction: Situating Gender, Care, and Migration in East Asia. In Gender, Care and Migration in East Asia (pp. 1-22). Palgrave Macmillan.
王翊涵(2011)。「我很辛苦,可是我不可憐!」東南亞新移民女性在台生活的優勢觀點分析。《臺大社會工作學刊》, 23,93-135。
林億玫、潘淑滿(2016 )。跨越「雇」事:新移民女性微型創業經驗。《社會政策與社會工作學刊》, 20(1),1 - 48。 |
第14週 |
6/01 |
【Week 14】Gender and disaster management--gender-inclusive disaster management
Enarson, E., & Meyreles, L. (2004). International perspectives on gender and disaster: differences and possibilities. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 24(10/11), 49-93.
卓春英、盧芷儀(2010)。貧窮、社會性別、與災難。《社區發展季刊》,131,154-168。
林耀盛、陳淑惠、洪福建、曾旭民(2005)。差異的聲音: 不同性別震災受創者心理社會反應之比較分析。《臨床心理學刊》,2(1),31-40。 |
第15週 |
6/08 |
【Week 15】多元成家以及同性戀婚姻
Fingerhut, A. W., Riggle, E. D., & Rostosky, S. S. (2011). Same‐sex marriage: The social and psychological implications of policy and debates. Journal of Social Issues, 67(2), 225-241.
Farr, R. H. (2017). Does parental sexual orientation matter? A longitudinal follow-up of adoptive families with school-age children. Developmental psychology, 53(2), 252.
簡至潔(2012)。從「同性婚姻」到「多元家庭」-朝向親密關係民主化的立法運動。《台灣人權學刊》,1(3),187-201。 |
第16週 |
6/15 |
【Week 16】paper presentation |
第17週 |
6/22 |
【Week 17】paper presentation |
|